Over 58900
politifake

Rich Politics


SILLY 47% - 53% OF THE MONEY IS FOR THE RICHEST 1%


TAGS: mitt romney money 47 rich
Rating: 2.65/5

More politifakes by marms

marms - October 23, 2012, 7:21 am
112 shares! Woot! Thanks for the siupport!
GrouchoMarxist - October 12, 2012, 9:33 pm
Funny... All I see is a punked kid with a Translator ring from his cereal box.... Keep s****** that koolaid like the champ you are....
romneyisatool - October 12, 2012, 7:07 pm
Okay, gotta go. Kicking Groucho's a$s gets old after awhile (too easy). See ya in a few weeks, peeps! Time to do some campaigning. To the rest of you... you won't win an election hanging out here all day. Remember that. Peace out! See you in a month. X-D
romneyisatool - October 12, 2012, 7:02 pm
TRANSLATION: (Groucho) I am a terrible liar.
romneyisatool - October 12, 2012, 7:01 pm
TRANSLATION (Groucho): Funny how I trip over my own tongue here... kinda like how Ryan did when bumbling over his lack of knowledge on Afghanistan. Doh!
GrouchoMarxist - October 12, 2012, 7:01 pm
I project nothing... You're no different than any other lib that had their b***s kicked here and elsewhere...
GrouchoMarxist - October 12, 2012, 7:00 pm
Funny how you trip over the libs here... Odd that...
romneyisatool - October 12, 2012, 7:00 pm
TRANSLATION (Groucho): Wish I had a life too. Oh, well, back to trolling!
romneyisatool - October 12, 2012, 6:59 pm
TRANSLATION (Groucho): I am projecting.
GrouchoMarxist - October 12, 2012, 6:59 pm
I guess this means you've either grown a brain in the last week or you're leaving?
romneyisatool - October 12, 2012, 6:59 pm
Understood. Glad to hear it.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 12, 2012, 6:58 pm

I stand up to Groucho plenty. But I do it without using playground tactics. How old are you?
crankyhead - October 12, 2012, 6:58 pm
The best way, IMO, is to turn them into adults, by using the power of logic, to get them interested in wanting to learn for themselves, how to use logic. Obviously, (and hopefully, I'm not stating a dubious premise here :P) some cases are hopeless.
GrouchoMarxist - October 12, 2012, 6:58 pm
Seriously... You need thicker skin...
romneyisatool - October 12, 2012, 6:58 pm
Nah, I promised Mooooo that I would help him make this site more peaceful. I can't do anything about you, teabagger, but while I am out campaigning, you are busy trolling this site since that's all you are good at.HAHA
GrouchoMarxist - October 12, 2012, 6:58 pm
You don't like the "Democrat" sal Alinsky method? Odd that
romneyisatool - October 12, 2012, 6:57 pm
Yup, Obama is smashing Romney in the polls. Need a tissue?
romneyisatool - October 12, 2012, 6:57 pm
Understandable. Peace is never a bad thing. Okay, gotta go. Out to do some campaigning. See you in a few weeks. Peace bro!
GrouchoMarxist - October 12, 2012, 6:56 pm
I've noticed you scaled back when bam bam got his a** handed to him... Follow the polls much?
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 12, 2012, 6:56 pm

Groucho is on his way to getting himself banned permanently. And if you keep fighting his fire with fire you'll not be far behind him. I'm not asking you to leave him alone, just lay off the insults. (Especially the p******** stuff).
GrouchoMarxist - October 12, 2012, 6:55 pm
Shame you can only bring adolescent insults... Facts not so much... Sorry, but remember this, you embody the entirety of your only "insult" towards me... Remember to smile
romneyisatool - October 12, 2012, 6:54 pm
P.S. By the way....saw that your boy Ryan was annihilated by Biden the other night. Need a tissue? LOL.. Better warm up your worn out knee pads. Ryan is in need of your lovin' after that beat down.Later teabagger. Clean yourself boy,you got teabagged.X-D
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 12, 2012, 6:54 pm

I am probably one of the least sensitive people you could ever meet. And I've got plenty of backbone. But the site rules forbid attacking people, and that's what matters here. I do not co-own politifake (I never said I did) I am the partner at religifake
romneyisatool - October 12, 2012, 6:52 pm
Okay, have fun. Back to campaigning. Will drop in to say "Hi!" in a few weeks. Later! :-)
romneyisatool - October 12, 2012, 6:51 pm
But once in a while it wouldn't kill you to grow a backbone. Groucho is a wimp and can't stand up to a good smackdown when he gets one. Never hurts him to occasionally remind him (and bullies like him) of that. Like Biden did to Ryan. Nuff said.
romneyisatool - October 12, 2012, 6:49 pm
So, I agree with your over all sentiment. That's why I can go for weeks without being here while Groucho can't go a day or two without being here. For the sake of peace, it's good to take a break from here and let the trolls duke it out.
romneyisatool - October 12, 2012, 6:48 pm
If you are really a co-owner of this site, you would've spoken to Mr.M months ago about banning Groucho for good for his chronic harassment. The fact that you haven't speaks volumes about you as his enabler.
romneyisatool - October 12, 2012, 6:47 pm
So I understand your point. It's a good one. But you embrace the opposite extreme and become an enabler... will encourages Groucho just as much as people who provoke him...
romneyisatool - October 12, 2012, 6:46 pm
Nah, you're a just being overly sensitive. And once I say my peace I move on. Groucho is addicted to this place. There lies the difference. But you are entitled to your opinion. So we just might have to agree to disagree. Peace out
romneyisatool - October 12, 2012, 6:45 pm
...but once in awhile you have to DO WATCHA GOTTA DO (what Biden did the other night) and put bullies and liars in their place. That's the real world. If you can't do that, then get out of the way.... or you will get steamrolled by those who have the will
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 12, 2012, 6:44 pm

There are proper ways to deal with children on the Internet. Sinking to their level isn't one of them. I'm starting to think that you're provoking him because you enjoy the insult tossing. I KNOW that's why he does it.
romneyisatool - October 12, 2012, 6:41 pm
Not too worried. Only one way to treat a pathetic bully like Crotcho. When they attack, you hit back... but much MUCH harder. If you want to be his doormat, that's your choice. I've scaled back my presence on here in light of your goal to keep peace...
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 12, 2012, 6:39 pm

FFS. You're not acting any better than he does right now. Try being the bigger man.
romneyisatool - October 12, 2012, 6:34 pm
And while the rest of us are too busy campaigning to take the time to respond to the teabagger, he is stuck here on Politifake because the *** offender list he is on forbids him from leaving his mom's basement.LOL. Say hi to Chris Hansen for us.X-D
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 12, 2012, 9:30 am

I came here out of curiosity.....I stay just to annoy you.
GrouchoMarxist - October 12, 2012, 8:36 am
Seriously... What are you doing on this forum? You're the one lacking...
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 12, 2012, 12:57 am

Really?....You just don't get this. Your brand of "debate" has no place in polite society.
GrouchoMarxist - October 11, 2012, 11:39 pm
That was a compliment
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 11, 2012, 10:09 pm

What part of "no personal attacks" do you not understand Groucho?. I swear you're trying to get yourself banned permanently.
GrouchoMarxist - October 11, 2012, 8:49 pm
Shame it's only among stupid moonbats like yourself that s****** koolaid
ughomer - October 11, 2012, 2:38 pm
Chin up, Marms. Done gud on this. 114 shares (plus mine).
marms - October 2, 2012, 9:16 pm
100 shares in 10 days! Thanks!
GrouchoMarxist - September 25, 2012, 8:43 am
Maybe you should get a job.
marms - September 25, 2012, 1:58 am
I love the sound of desperate Mitt-Tard Trolls in the morning :)
arnnatz - September 25, 2012, 12:50 am
Hey, marms, walmart is running a special on tin foil. Make some pretty nice liberal hats
knucklesworth - September 24, 2012, 10:55 pm
NAME ME ONE CANDIDATE THAT WOULDN'Y TAKE 53% OF THE VOTE VS 47?
GrouchoMarxist - September 24, 2012, 9:54 pm
Don't confuse the moonbat with facts
foxrecon19d - September 24, 2012, 9:53 pm
actually, 75% of America's tax burden is for the richest 1%
GrouchoMarxist - September 24, 2012, 9:19 pm
Don't you hate the ring that paper hat leaves on your head?


MR. FANTASTIC - Is Mitt Romney Reed Richards???




Richard Nixon -


TAGS: richard nixon america
Rating: 2.14/5

More politifakes by deathorfire1

RonaldReagan - February 7, 2017, 1:07 am
One good thing about Trump...when he's done, he will make Nixon look like FDR.
birddseedd - December 28, 2013, 4:59 pm
My pastor says he was the best president we have ever had, the only thing he did wrong was get caught.
deathorfire1 - July 17, 2013, 8:00 pm
Alert FoxRecon19d just admitted to having Obama's child. Quick get the press
foxrecon19d - July 17, 2013, 7:47 pm
Show us crankyhead the Canadifake, where you have backed up your devoted love of Obama. After all, your god Obsma protects you, right? Don't be a hypocrite and tell Obama where yyou live! Show everyone how right you are! GO, CRANKYHEAD!
foxrecon19d - July 17, 2013, 7:40 pm
I am giving you three...two...one...Nope . You are still officially a loser begging for attention.
crankyhead - July 17, 2013, 2:37 pm
Fox, what're the chances you can go a whole week without saying my name, or asking a member for their home address? I'm guessing 0%.
foxrecon19d - July 15, 2013, 6:03 pm
So you admit to loving your little sis ter... yes, you are the perfect example of a Democrat
deathorfire1 - July 15, 2013, 5:53 pm
Well it was nice talking to you my little sister.
foxrecon19d - July 15, 2013, 5:51 pm
So now we know. Deathorfire1 dug up her dead mother. f***ed her dead body.Then went on politifake.. good on you being the voice og Democrats on politifake
deathorfire1 - July 15, 2013, 5:41 pm
My mother has been dead for five years and i don't f*** dead bodies.
foxrecon19d - July 15, 2013, 5:39 pm
Just YOU! HA! HA! HA! Oh, by the way. The woman that you proudly say you are f***ing is your own mother. You are drunk
deathorfire1 - July 15, 2013, 5:26 pm
Sure, i'm upstairs f***ing your mother. Tell me how many children did you leave fatherless because you had *** with their mother?
foxrecon19d - July 15, 2013, 5:25 pm
Really. Viqueen? Name the one Spez loser that killed me with their pinkie. BUT FIRST! Post your address so that I can get his name in person
deathorfire1 - July 15, 2013, 5:22 pm
I didn't make a poster of him scaring me. I made a poster of him invading peoples privacy for free. Remember Watergate?
foxrecon19d - July 15, 2013, 5:21 pm
HA! Little viqueen wannabe. If Nixon never scared you, why is a terrified "viking" have to make a poster about how scared you are of him?
deathorfire1 - July 15, 2013, 4:58 pm
One Richard Nixon doesn't scare me. If your going to keep pulling out the fake king card then you can go pick the cotton. You want to troll me just to stop your p**** from hurting, i'll just troll your diseased p**** back.
foxrecon19d - July 15, 2013, 4:56 pm
Now tell me again how Richard Nixon scares the s#it out of your pasty white little a$$... and reinerate to cannabal, crankyhead, and Renza how you are now their king
deathorfire1 - July 15, 2013, 4:52 pm
I highly doubt that. The Russian Spez could kill you with their pinkie
foxrecon19d - July 15, 2013, 4:51 pm
HA! HA! HA! I am an American who happens to be black. I am a proud American. I am a successful American. And I am an American warrior who uses Russian Spez to hold up my coffee table and to lick my boots...
deathorfire1 - July 15, 2013, 4:17 pm
Typical white thinking.
foxrecon19d - July 15, 2013, 4:16 pm
Yes , deathorfire1. Tell your friends cannabal, crankyhead, and Renza who supplied the rope for the lynchings
deathorfire1 - July 15, 2013, 4:11 pm
How about during the time when the African Americans were trying to get equal rights. Guess who supplied the rope for the lynchings.
foxrecon19d - July 15, 2013, 4:08 pm
And what instance are you refering to, desthorfore1? I don't often tolerate blatant stupidity. But you are so epic stupid that you make toying with you entertaining.
deathorfire1 - July 15, 2013, 3:57 pm
Fox are you have anything to say for your murder of children by supporting cops that don't give a d***?
foxrecon19d - July 15, 2013, 3:56 pm
Cannabal? Crankyhead? Renza? Anything you want to say to your new spokeswoman deathorfire1?
deathorfire1 - July 15, 2013, 3:55 pm
Actually i love females, i just hate you.
foxrecon19d - July 15, 2013, 3:53 pm
Hates himself AND females
deathorfire1 - July 15, 2013, 3:53 pm
Nope, mine is the great mighty leader Death. Death to all of mankind so the next race can do better.
foxrecon19d - July 15, 2013, 3:52 pm
cannabl, crankyhead...deathorfire1 isn't your great white hope to get you back into the good graces of your lord and master, Obama
deathorfire1 - July 15, 2013, 3:51 pm
Hey fox can you read? I said i hate both sides equally. Also i did state i am a guy not a girl. So fox when was the last time your side followed the Constitution?
foxrecon19d - July 15, 2013, 3:49 pm
And there it is. YAWN... Typical. Deathorfire1 hates herself. Projects her self hate on Republicans, just as the Democrat main stream media told you to do.
deathorfire1 - July 15, 2013, 3:44 pm
Because i hate both sides equally and believe there is no future for man kind.
KaBoom - July 15, 2013, 3:40 pm
You believe that all Republicans clapped in unison when JFK was murdered? Why are you so hateful?
KaBoom - July 15, 2013, 3:37 pm
That simply isn't true. If you are going to complain at least employ the correct talking point. The SCOTUS decision had to due with disenfranchising minority voters; not segregation.
deathorfire1 - July 15, 2013, 3:36 pm
So nice to see a peace monger around. Didn't you Republicans clap when JFK died?
foxrecon19d - July 15, 2013, 3:30 pm
I AM RICHARD NIXON. I PULLED AMERICAN TROOPS OUT OF VIETNAM WHEN THE DEMOCRSTS STARTED THE WAR INSTEAD OF NUKING THE COUNTRY...like deathorfire1 wanted to do... The Truth Hurts
foxrecon19d - July 15, 2013, 3:17 pm
Richard Nixon- Still striking fear into the hearts of the enemies of the people of the United States of America
deathorfire1 - July 15, 2013, 2:59 pm
Thank you Crankyhead, i think that nut might listen but i doubt it.
crankyhead - July 15, 2013, 2:47 pm
...it wasn't the people on the left who were outed as astroturfers by the administration on this website. The people who got caught doing that, were the rightwing nutjobs. People like you.
crankyhead - July 15, 2013, 2:44 pm
Just out of curiosity fox, do you know what the word paranee means? It's just that every time someone new in here starts schooling you in a discussion, you always blame either me or Renza for being responsible. Just in case you'd forgotten...
foxrecon19d - July 15, 2013, 6:25 am
Your dog wishes he had a more intelligent woman to talk to
deathorfire1 - July 15, 2013, 1:43 am
Sorry was having a more intelligent talk with my dog.
foxrecon19d - July 14, 2013, 11:02 pm
keep posting deathorfire1... keep posting...
foxrecon19d - July 14, 2013, 10:51 pm
snicker...of course. looking forward to your next poster...heh...heh...heh...
deathorfire1 - July 14, 2013, 10:27 pm
Yes diseased american, we have the same on you.
foxrecon19d - July 14, 2013, 10:14 pm
Thanks... got all the data we need on you.
deathorfire1 - July 14, 2013, 9:28 pm
I am guy for the last f***ing time. You call me ignorant look at you. I'm a guy which means male which means i have a ***k. So foxs**t19d what is your excuse about being ignorant?
foxrecon19d - July 14, 2013, 9:25 pm
...heh...heh..heh...heh...keep trying, desthorfire1. You know we are laughiing, right, deathorfire1. Seriously, fat girl.
deathorfire1 - July 14, 2013, 9:15 pm
Oh yes oh i'm dying. *sarcasm* The same can be said about your religion.
foxrecon19d - July 14, 2013, 9:13 pm
HaHaHa! And now we know don't we cranky renzahead. You know the truth kills you. America knows the truth kills you. Thank you for helping to get out the truth
deathorfire1 - July 14, 2013, 9:07 pm
Hmm keep fighting with this little b**** or move to canada surrender my american ship. Second option sounds better, better health care and freedom.
foxrecon19d - July 14, 2013, 9:06 pm
Snicker... keep posting. Go ahead. R eally. The people you love and support are not collecting data on you. Keep posting. After all, Obama loves you, right? NOW MAKE ANOTHER OBAMA LOVING POSTER, BIT#! 8
deathorfire1 - July 14, 2013, 9:01 pm
Oh a christian is attacking me? How not surprising. Make a post about an attack on privacy and i got a racist christian attacking me.
deathorfire1 - July 14, 2013, 9:00 pm
And if i wanted to be the like the rest of you American pigs i would go eight miles to a town or pay to watch TV which i find no use watching. Might i ask where the hell you people were complaining about bush when he did the same thing invading privacy?
foxrecon19d - July 14, 2013, 8:58 pm
Bottom line, toots.Know what you are talking about. Or else, you a**assinate Barack Obama with your stupid parroting of what Obama told you to say. In other words, you look stupid to your own Gods
deathorfire1 - July 14, 2013, 8:57 pm
I am a male. Two Obama is invading but for all we now he could be trying to save his own skin. Second might i point out that a court of a country you love so much destroyed a law against segregation. Just wait a bit and i'll attack your Rebel flag bigot.
foxrecon19d - July 14, 2013, 8:55 pm
Wow... classic Obama-bot here. Knows absolutely nothing. Claims genius status about a subject she knows absolutely nothing about...apart from what Saturday Night Live tells her lil a$$ to believe
deathorfire1 - July 14, 2013, 8:39 pm
One what the f*** is an Obama-bot. Second might i point out that all this poster was to point out that Obama wasn't the first one to invade our privacy.
foxrecon19d - July 14, 2013, 8:01 pm
Sicker...Wow, you are an especially stupid Obama-bot ain't cha? Or have you not noticed that evev your fellow Obama-bots fail to say Obama cut 700 billion from Medicare? Go read something before you go posting played out propaganda
deathorfire1 - July 14, 2013, 7:34 pm
Funny. Nixon destroyed the health care and your right to privacy due to the "Red threat". The only president was good was Clinton and he brought us up, bush took us down and Obama brought us up by a trillion.
foxrecon19d - July 14, 2013, 7:31 pm
Funny...anyone remember America being 16 trillion in debt under Nixon? The Obama-bots are desperate today!


OBAMA HOOD -


TAGS: obama hood rob from the rich give to the poor
Rating: 3.67/5

More politifakes by Chillax

HSHendy - September 16, 2012, 11:08 pm
Robin Hood would be a republican not a democrate. He took from the over taxing fat cat king Jon and gave back to the poor taxpayer, his subjects.


Stupid Socialist Sanders -




The Demonic Hypocrisy Of Planned Parenthood -




AMERICA - Learn our tax history.


TAGS: tax cuts for the rich
Rating: 2.72/5

More politifakes by Jrock

Pikeman - November 4, 2015, 8:29 am
Just because the tax rate has been worse than what is being inflicted does not make 40% good, necessary, or enhance revenue.
JGalt - November 30, 2013, 8:38 pm
Liberals conveniently leave out what they don't want pointed out- Where's JFK? LBJ? Jimmy Carter? what do those tax rates look like? Hmmm
birddseedd - November 28, 2013, 10:56 pm
94% huh. i want a reference


OH CRY ME A RIVER - Andrew Schiff and Alan Dlugash.SHUT UP!!!




WEALTH DISTRIBUTION - Yeah this totally looks fair. Lets give them a tax cut.


TAGS: rich taxes
Rating: 3.34/5

More politifakes by Jrock



Obama The Elitist Hypocrite -




The Sad State Of Modern Day Feminism -




If You Ever Feel Stupid... -




ROMNEY & RYAN - THE RICHEST TICKET IN U.S. HISTORY




CLASS WARFARE CONSERVATIVE STYLE - The worker making $7.25 an hour is paid too much. While the CEO making millions a year is paying way too much in Taxes.




Eat the Rich -




'LET THEM EAT CAKE' - Because nothing says more than "Obama just does not get it" than flying in renouned chefs, in between exotic vacations, golf outings and concerts.




NEWT GINGRICH - PROOF OF EVOLUTION




Educate yourself -


TAGS: eat the rich
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by JohnGalt

JohnGalt - November 19, 2016, 8:10 pm
LOL. Thank goodness we don't have to see her face as POTUS
Cyberhagen - November 19, 2016, 7:53 pm
Oh Christ, I'm going to have nightmares from this picture!


GOD'S WILL - for you to go home and close your mouth




NEWT GINGRICH - for president




NEWT GINGRICH - Bringing big government to the moon...and beyond!




YOU JUST MIGHT BE A LIBERAL - if you sympathize with rich liberals who preach redistribution of everyone else's wealth!




GARY BUSEY - Endorses Newt Gingrich




Bernie's New Deal For America -




Liberal America -




Bernie Supporters -




Scientific Consensus on Global Warming??? -


TAGS: global warming consensus climate change hoax scam farce michael crichton junk science green religion alarmists warmists greenies al gore ipcc agenda21
Rating: 4.69/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - April 25, 2015, 9:29 pm
I've seen worse, Ala 62039. Being fired for pointing out AGW junk science.
OTC - April 25, 2015, 6:19 pm
You're wrong again, "activist" scientists, not scientists. Activist scientists have been caught drawing conclusions before doing the research, its not that hard to follow along.
calron - April 25, 2015, 5:00 pm
What's really bad is that natural variability could be used to support AGW, but some shout denier whenever you bring it up as a cause for warming.
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 4:48 pm
As long as it annoys Rebecca, it is worth it to me. X-D It's the only thing keeping me going, mate. :-) F*ck carrots and gum.
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:48 pm
Like when Rush Limbaugh lied this week about the Duke study. The authors of that study actually came out against him because the political media does this all of the time. That is scientists up in arm over being exploited in a non-debate
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:46 pm
By now, it's common sense knowledge in the world of academia that climatology firmly supports the theory of MMCC. The scientific community is not at odds over this. It's the public that is on the fence. Talking about it too much distracts from the issue
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:43 pm
Don't really care about any of that. If or when the media is wrong about MMCC, doesn't change the fact that the science community is firmly behind MMCC in both consensus and findings.
calron - April 25, 2015, 2:39 pm
Roughly 1.59% of the abstracts reach the conclusion that he says the majority agrees with. That's not in the ballpark. If he chose a different standard to measure the consensus, he could have got the 97.1%.
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:33 pm
the scientists will just get each other's back like some country club. That's absurd. That's not what peer review means. On this issue, there has been enough fact checking that this bias would've been revealed by the present.
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:31 pm
It would appear Faux is talking about peer-reviewed journals about climate change, not the consensus. Roughly speaking, virtually all of them ARE behind the MMCC theory. OTC's problem is he thinks peer review is biased because
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:27 pm
Cook is guilty of being sloppy, not being debunked. Roughly speaking, he was in the ball park. Again you are splitting hairs hun. Peer review has caught it. It's just not a big enough issue to matter. Climatology isn't up in arms over this for good reason
calron - April 25, 2015, 2:24 pm
I've red a few and this is not necessary true. Take Cook's census for example. It reaches a conclusion that is debunked by Cook's own numbers rather than reaching the conclusion supported by the numbers. Peer review should catch it, but it still happens.
OTC - April 25, 2015, 12:34 pm
Like the past 2 years of unusual cool climate is suddenly "just weather". Anyways, have a good weekend and break that cig habit, you're more amusing nicotine free :-)
OTC - April 25, 2015, 12:31 pm
*Sigh* Perhaps you missed my posts stating that I don't deny human impact (contributing), I'm fully aware of MMCO2 but I do deny it's the sole driver of current trends in CC. And I notice anything to the contrary of MMCC is not welcomed
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:23 am
Alrighty then. Off to start my weekend. A night of me designated driving for my friends while others get drunk :-/ WEEEEE! Anyhow, fun jousting with you mate. Let's do it again next week if the spirit moves us, OTC. Cheers. :-) Fox is off the air.
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:20 am
P.S. Don't think I didn't notice you abandoning your cosmic ray Henrik denier theory. ;-) Is science like a crap shoot for you? One of these days do you just hope to roll the dice 'just right' and find a random link that will finally pay off? X-D
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:16 am
The only Quote from that article that matters - "It does not, the authors emphasize, change the evidence of human impact on global climate beginning in the 20th century." #PWNEDYOURSELF
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:16 am
Even you admit, in your game of pigeon chess, that they are not removing the human element. You're grasping for straws - everything else you said is irrelevant in light of that concession.
OTC - April 25, 2015, 1:10 am
http://phys.org/news/2014-08-global-temperature-conundrum-cooling-climate.html
OTC - April 25, 2015, 1:08 am
Well even this states it doesn't. remove the human equation, but the climate models didn't predict a cooling and that has them confused, which is funny because not everything was used in the models because scientists didn't think it was significant
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:20 pm
...the peer rev.studies themselves are pretty dry and free of politics.They make for boring reads,like plumbing manuals.They are not to be confused with the lib media that reports and distorts them.Hope this helps to FINALLY clear that up. Cheers mate :-)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:20 pm
...the peer rev.studies themselves are pretty dry and free of politics.They make for boring reads,like plumbing manuals.They are not to be confused with the lib media that reports and distorts them.Hope this helps to FINALLY clear that up. Cheers mate :-)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:15 pm
...I think, sometimes, you are confusing the political conclusions drawn by the liberal crowd which I agree are conflated.However,the peer-reviewed journals simply say:MMCC is unequivocal.They do not endorse the dire predictions of Al Gore or the libs...
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:13 pm
...in that sense, we've always been in agreement. The libs, as badly as the GOPers, have dragged the science dialogue into the political gutter. And the libs have their own denier issue to deal with -- the anti-vaccination movement...
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:08 pm
...The scientists are just reporting their findings. How long and how bad MMCC will affect the planet is up for conjecture.All they can claim is it's happening and a serious issue.It's not meant to be a crystal ball about next years temps or Superbowl win
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:06 pm
P.S. Before you go down another rabbit hole, I can save you the trouble: all the consensus says about MMCC is that it is unequivocal.It doesnt claim to predict everything. It doesnt claim it will be the end of the world.The lib politicians are doing that
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 8:56 pm
Source? I think I'm sure about what you are speaking about. But with you, I can never be sure. ;-) Provide a citation, please. And yes, the MMCC debate ended more or less many years ago. It's not confusing for the scientists, just the quacks.
OTC - April 24, 2015, 8:51 pm
If the debate on MMCC is over, then why is there a global temperature conundrum that scientists plan to address this fall? I thought it was settled.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:20 pm
...except Scientology. You can judge Scientology. X-D
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:19 pm
Scientology was created in the 20th century by a science fiction author. An awful science fiction author. Religion of any kind holds us back. But none of us has the right to judge the other - Be you Xtian, Jew, Muslim, Agnostic Atheist...etc
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:15 pm
I actually respect religion even if I don't believe in God. I just don't respect fundamentalism. If you want to pick on a religion of liberal geeks, pick on Scientology. It has "science" in the title, at least. It is a liberal tard fest. X-D
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:13 pm
The science on MMCC is simply a report on the findings. Whatever problem you have with the politics of it comes with your own philosophical problem with how science works, which a**umes a theocratic pov as the inverse since you are making this about faith
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:09 pm
And by "theocratic", what I mean by that is - again, it's revealed when you overplayed your hand with your philosophical problem with science: Science doesn't pretend to be infallible. That is what religion is for. Science isn't a religion for geeks.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 12:53 pm
No, becca. Coffee. Lots and lots of coffee :-/ They have Taco Bell Mountain Dew Baja Blast in the can now for a limited time! :-D Now I dont have to sneak my McDonald's cup into there and steal it. X-D I can get my caffeine fix from the convenience store.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 12:51 pm
You have such unreasonable distrust toward science,wildly a**uming political bias everywhere you can.Yet you haven't a skeptical bone in your body over secular Christian ideology,which is rife with politics? You have a theocratic agenda on MMCC, mate(2/2)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 12:41 pm
It proves you are more than a simple contrarian. It proves you are delusional, mate. :-/ Your problem isn't with MMCC. Your problem is with science, and how it works. And your issue with it is a purely philosophical one.(1/2)
rebeccaolsen - April 24, 2015, 12:29 pm
You're actually on top of things for a change.Not that obliterating OTC's argument is rocket science.Regular science would do - something he doesnt comprehend.But a coherent argument from you,Faux? You must've remembered your nicotine gum this morning :)
rebeccaolsen - April 24, 2015, 12:21 pm
"when the facts show it is wrong following a proper scientific inquiry,which already demonstrated human-induced CC was unequivocal." Finishing that sentence for you,denier :) Know you wanted to imply politics or bias was behind the rejection.Not today hun
OTC - April 24, 2015, 11:37 am
I didn't state that he disproved MMCC. But this does prove that research that finds reasons for CC other than humans is rejected.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 10:23 am
And how does your idiotic anecdotal observations about weather counter my thorough refutation of Henrik? The man YOU CITED as DISPROVING MMCC?? Oh yeah,it doesn't because you can't - hence this LAME red-herring, Im sorry, I meant 'attempt at sarcasm.' :-)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 10:14 am
lol...You can't be serious, mate...lolololol...Yeah, the scientist's evidence vs. your own two eyes. Well...I went to China last year and didn't fall off the Earth. Guess those flat Earthers were right! X-D Hmmmm?
OTC - April 24, 2015, 8:10 am
Let me guess, a tornado? GW! a hurricane? GW! a blizzard? GW! so this cooler than usual weather must be GW, right? isn't that what the consensus is?
OTC - April 24, 2015, 8:07 am
We're told 2014 was the h**test year on record, yet when I'm usually experiencing several days in the 100s, we had 1, maybe 2 days in '14. & for the 2nd yr in a row its almost May but instead of the normal 90s we are barely hitting the 80 degree mark
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 10:01 pm
So please, mate, call me a "denier." In fact, I will be disappointed in you if you don't. Yes, I'm the biggest JUNK SCIENCE DENIER around. ;-) If in your game of pigeon chess that represents Check mate, then it's a game I'm PROUD to lose. #WINNINGBYLOSING
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:57 pm
But basically you say any interpretation of science you present is BEING DENIED if we disagree with it. Fair enough. I'm a JUNK SCIENCE DENIER. I see your junk science and raise you 10000+ peer reviewed studies and the 97-99% consensus that backs it.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:56 pm
It's point (B) you are refuting. Now with your debunked cosmic ray nonsense. The effectiveness of GCRs in cloud formation has been shown to be dubious. GCRs exert a very tiny influence over low-level cloud cover, not enough to account for sh*t.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:53 pm
But the reason WE KNOW man-made CO2 is causing GW now is because (A) CO2 in theory CAN cause CC (a point you've conceded) and (B) thousands of investigations by reputable scientists and have found the correlation in a myriad of ways that is unequivocal.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:52 pm
Just because man-made CO2 or cosmic rays COULD cause climate change, doesn't mean all climate change is caused by CO2 and cosmic rays. See what I did there? I included CO2 as well.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:50 pm
Sure...if all this happened, it could cause global warming. But there is ZERO evidence that any of this happened. And by pushing it, you are engaging in a causal fallacy. ie.Just because Socrates is a man, doesn't mean all men are Socrates.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:49 pm
In order for GCRs to successfully seed clouds, they must induce aerosol formation which THEN must grow sufficiently through the condensation of gas in our atmosphere to form cloud-condensation nuclei. Then his must lead to increased cloud formation.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:47 pm
FACT- Cosmic ray flux on Earth has been monitored since the 1950s, and has shown ZERO-ZILCH-NADA significant trends over that period. FACT - our global solar magnetic field also has NOT changed appreciably over the past thirty years.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:45 pm
However, it turns out that none of these hypotheticals that Henrik proposed are occurring in reality. For instance, a nuclear winter COULD create global cooling. But that doesn't mean nukes caused the ice age.lol.. What matters is the PRESENT causes NOW
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:39 pm
Hypothetically, an increasing solar magnetic field COULD deflect cosmic rays, which hypothetically seeds low-level clouds, thus decreasing the Earth's reflectivity and causing GW.That's his hypothesis.But is that ACTUALLY happening? Is it the reality now?
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:36 pm
In fact, it's funny, but you are pretty much just copying and pasting what Henrik is saying. I know. I checked. Again, here is the refutation mate--->
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:34 pm
You're simply posting something without demonstrating comprehension of the concepts involved.I gave you the methodology to verify your claims.You ignored it and simply repeated an empirically disproven concept.In other words,you're talking out of your a$s
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:31 pm
Mother nature is not denying the science. You are, denier. There are 4 requirements that must be true for his theory to be valid. They failed to produce results when tested repeatedly against empirical variables. And you are not replying to that.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:28 pm
And that didn't reply at all to the evidence I cited. Just more pigeon chess from you. Yes, you are good at the copy and paste function, mate. Now apply that same vigor to actually learning the science you deny. :-) You might learn something
OTC - April 23, 2015, 9:02 pm
You understand his findinds that when the sun is active, as it has been, it shields us from cosmic rays reducing cloud cover which heats up the planet. with the sun becoming less active, more cosmic rays will produce more clouds
OTC - April 23, 2015, 8:55 pm
The sun is going into a grand minimum, temperatures have flatten recently and scientists are suggesting a cooling period. There's too much invested in the MMGW hype to accept a Global Cooling. Everyone can deny that science, but Mother Nature won't
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:21 pm
It turns out that none of these Hen'schypotheticals are occurring in reality, and if cosmic rays were able to influence global temperatures, they would be having a cooling effect. This IS why he is ignored and why you don't know **** about MMCC.Cheers :-)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:18 pm
In summary,studies have shown that GCRs exert a minor influence over low-level cloud cover,solar magnetic field has not increased in recent decades,nor has GCR flux on Earth decreased.In fact,if GCRs did have a significant impact,cooling wouldve occurred
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:16 pm
3)Cosmic rays must successfully seed low-level clouds.4)Low-level cloud cover must have a long-term negative trend. Fortunately climatology had empirical variables against which they tested these requirements. Study after indie study debunked Hen's theory
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:12 pm
In order for this theory to be plausible, all four of the following requirements must be true.1)Solar magnetic field must have a long-term positive trend.2)Galactic cosmic ray flux on Earth must have a long-term negative trend
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:09 pm
, the Sun can turn the temperature up and down. ... As the Sun’s magnetism doubled in strength during the 20th century, this natural mechanism may be responsible for a large part of global warming seen then." End quack quote. (2/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:07 pm
Henrik Svensmark says -- It's cosmic rays! The quack says, "When the Sun is active, its magnetic field is better at shielding us against the cosmic rays coming from outer space, before they reach our planet. By regulating the Earth’s cloud cover,(1/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:05 pm
who also say radiation is proof of Jesus's resurrection because they claim it explains away the carbon dating which shows the Shroud of Turin to have originated a few hundred years ago, not 2000 yrs ago. Junk science is real neat, huh? (2/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:01 pm
He IS ignored because he was proven wrong. PERIOD. He blames everything and I mean EVERYTHING on cosmic rays, including evolution. Congrats! You know how to use Google, mate. ;-) While you at it there you'll find these Russian "scientists" too (1/2)
OTC - April 23, 2015, 5:09 pm
Like Henrik Svensmark who gets ignored because his research didn't coincide with the consensus
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 4:20 pm
Even so, Michael Crichton's opinion on this means about as much to the CC debate as Steven Spielberg's opinion. ie.Not very much. A poster like this plainly proves the deniers are simply trolling science. It is proof of nothing. 1 Lion
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 4:18 pm
We are discussing 10000+ studies, reproducible results, in what is called PEER-REVIEW. The consensus vernacular is plainly the "CC for Dummies" explanation for that.It is not meant as a substitute for hard science, which already exists for MMCC(2/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 4:14 pm
Michael Crichton, who is the author of this quote, never did a study on climate change. Nor was he a climatologist. The part you missed, though, was where he says: "what is relevant is reproducible results." Every major CC study has been reproduced(1/2)


$2000.00 DRESS - goes good on $4,000,000.00 tax-payer vacation




CONSERVATIVES - Ensuring a Liberal victory one speech at a time.




SHAME ON YOU... - to those who didn’t vote for RON PAUL because you felt another candidate could beat Obama!




DOESN'T IT FEEL GOOD - To stick it to The Man?




ATHEISM - Because science cannot prove or disprove God, believing there is no God requires one to believe in something unprovable.




TEA PARTY CANDIDATES - Some of them make it too easy.




FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY FAIL -




THE MIDDLE CLASS - do not spend $6,800 on a Jacket




IN HARMS WAY -




POOR JON STEWART - can't decide which of his three homes to sleep in




I'M CURIOUS - I wonder how many of these capitalism-hating protestors use iPhones, wear designer sneakers or glasses and drink Starbucks coffee and blog on their Sony computers?




OWS: EAT THE RICH - Isn't Lady Gaga already one of the rich?




JON BON JOVI - $100.00 in taxes last year democrats take care of their own




WELL, CRAP ! - I guess my "Tax the Rich" didn't work out so well


TAGS: obama tax rich
Rating: 4.33/5

More politifakes by OlderThanDirt

OlderThanDirt - September 8, 2012, 10:42 am
All that was missing from her speech was violins and pics of starving 3rd world orphans.
GrouchoMarxist - September 7, 2012, 8:24 pm
And the too small shoes?
OlderThanDirt - September 7, 2012, 8:19 pm
LOL.Ya, and they lived in the building behind him.
JGalt - September 7, 2012, 8:15 pm
Is that the rusted out car and the dumpster furniture Michelle said they furnished their $277k condo in the 90's???


TWO BILLIONAIRE ASSHOLES - Think school teachers make too much money.




BLOVIATE - blo·vi·ate/ Verb: To talk at length, esp. in an inflated, pompous or empty way.




UNIONS - As they decline so do we.




MORALS - This guy has "ZERO"




TEABAGGERS - HAD ENOUGH OF THEM YET? -




REALLY FAT DUDE MICHAEL MOORE -




THE PARTY OF THE OLIGARCHY - Democrats are "the party of billionaires, academics, minorities and single women." - Christopher Caldwell, Financial Times, February 24, 2012




Democrats Are A Special Kind Of Stupid -




This Guy Performs More Mammograms Than Planned Parenthood -




BIDEN ROOTS - "My dad never worked in a Food Fair. My dad never wore a blue collar,"




NEWT GINGRICH - "The higher a monkey climbs on the pole, the more you can see his butt." David Axelrod Would this comment be okay if it was about Obama?




THE LESSER OF TWO EVILS? - Feel like you're always voting for The Lesser of Two Evils? VOTE FOR RON PAUL!




THE FIRST REPUBLICAN - The man had psychic powers.




NEWT - SLIMY AND SLIPPERY JUST LIKE THE SALAMANDER HE WAS NAMED AFTER




GET A JOB! - IF THE RICH, REPUGLICAN CORPORATIONS WOULD STOP SENDING THE JOBS OVERSEAS THERE MIGHT BE A FEW LEFT HERE.




400 - The number of families who now own more wealth than the bottom 50% of Americans combined.




NEWT GINGRICH - comments on Obamacare




CALLISTA GINGRICH - the reason newt fell in love with a moon




NEWT GINGRICH - As King he will not listen to the U.S. Court system.




dead-broke -




GINGRICH CAMPAIGN RISING - A new bacth of viagra must have come in.




CANADIANS - Now richer than Americans, for the first time ever.




TWO-FACED - If you all have been paying attention, Obama is still talking about those pesky $250,000 a year millionaires. Translation: Anyone likely earning more than $50k a year will see their taxes go way up.




WALL STREET PROTESTERS - They think they can run things better than businesspeople.... (yet they can't handle simple thinks like reversed images in mirrors)




MINNESOTA GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN - Gov. Dayton, the GOP gave you a balanced budget w/o raising taxes. You vetoed it. The shutdown is YOUR fault!!




RMONEY- WE ARE ALL NOW FILTHY RICH THANKS TO OBAMA -




main reason -




Liberals are like the ostriches -




OBAMA BEGINS PUSH FOR NEW NATIONAL RETIREMENT SYSTEM. - "We have it in our power to begin the world over again."




REPUBLICANS - Just rich old white folks




STOCK MARKET - WHO SAYS GAMBLING ISN'T LEGA L?




TARGET ON HIS BACK - Looks like AP moved way up on the clown's enemy list, what with his new $100 million contract. Punish the rich!




MICHAEL MOORE - Crusades against capitalism (while getting rich from capitalism)




IMMUTABLE TRUTH - Eat the Rich: Take EVERY PENNY from families making over $250k a year (remember, that's what Obama decided makes you unworthy of your $...and that pays for another 141 days of our government budget




YOU JUST CAN'T MAKE THIS SHIT UP! -




Politicians Recrutin' The Poor -




JOKE - Romney - What do you call 1,000 Democrats at the bottom of the ocean? A good start .




GINGRICH - IT'S AS SIMPLE AS THIS. YOU'RE EITHER GOING TO VOTE FOR A CHRISTIAN LIKE ME, RON PAUL, OR SANTORUM, OR YOU'RE GOING TO VOTE FOR A NON-CHRISTIAN LIKE ROMNEY OR OBAMA.




TAX THE PEOPLE WHO CANNOT AFFORD TO HIRE ME -




COUNSEL - The dummy says it rich people's fault




OBAMA DEMOCRAT - they are easy to spot




NEWT GINGRICH - Ready to bring foreign jobs back to America




DEFEATING CLIMATE CHANGE COMMERCIAL - Your campaign's over before it started, Newt!




LET'S TAX AND PUNISH THE RICH. - Because I've always gotten well paying jobs from poor people.




EAT THE RICH - Obaama's spending habits are destroying this country https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=661pi6K-8WQ


TAGS: eat the rich
Rating: 3.67/5

More politifakes by JGalt



Distance -




JANUARY SWEARING IN OF CONGRESS - Can't come soon enough.




One grieving family to another -




WELFARE - IT'S WHAT GOVERNMENT HELP IS CALLED WHEN YOU'RE NOT THE ONE GETTING IT




PUPPETRY OF THE POTUS - Coming soon to a vacation spot near you!




TAX THE RICH - If the government taxed everyone making $114,000 or more at 100%, it would not cover the 3.6T budget Obama proposes. Taxing the rich is NOT the answer!




LUXURY YACHT - John Kerry submits this photo to the State of Massachusetts to have his luxury yacht assessed for excise tax valuation.




NIXON MEETS PRESLY -




GALACTIC GINGRICH - Bringing big government to the moon...and beyond.




RYAN SEACREST- $60 MILLON MAN - Just like Justin Bieber- it goes to show that you don't need talent, nor do you need to resort to being a corrupt politician to become rich and famous.




Seriously ? -




MITT ROMNEY'S - Billionaire boys club donation request flyer. "Together we can make the middle class pay all the bills!"


TAGS: romney rich tax cut
Rating: 3.25/5

More politifakes by starryeyedguy

foxrecon19d - September 13, 2012, 6:24 pm
Seeing as how the top ten percent of Americans foot 75% of America's bills, as President Obama so famously put it, "You would think they would be THANKING me!"


LIBERAL - What so few people see past the Watergate.




GOVT SPENDING - Not an issue! Its those damn rich people, really!




PREV PAGENEXT PAGE